CISN - How Cancer is Studied - Meta-Analysis
| You Are Here: Home > Cancer Research > How Cancer is Studied > Epidemiology > Meta-Analysis | ||
Meta-AnalysisMeta-analysis is a structured literature review technique that attempts to combine similar studies to determine the average effect size for a particular treatment under comparable circumstances with comparable participants. Meta-analysis is all about putting the different pieces of the puzzle together in a scientific way. It combines the findings of many different studies using statistical methods. These studies offer a real, quantifiable sense of where the evidence is leading. Cumulative Evidence Cumulative evidence is another method used to look at the big picture. Rather than using a complex mathematical model, though, cumulative evidence simply means stacking up all the related studies and figuring out what they say overall. Think of a fictional detective looking at fingerprints, eyewitness testimony, DNA evidence, and circumstantial evidence, and putting them all together to see what kind of case they build.
Meta-analysis can be used as a guide to answer the question: 'Does what we are doing make a difference to X' even if 'X' has been measured using different instruments across a range of different people? Meta-analysis provides a systematic overview of quantitative research that has examined a particular question. |
| Section Index | |
| What We Know About Cancer | |
| ● | How Cancer is Studied |
| Drug Development | |
| New Treatments | |
| Research Advocacy | |
Advantages of meta-analysis: It combines all the research on one topic into one large study with many participants. Disadvantage: The danger is that in combining a large set of different studies the construct definitions can become imprecise and the results difficult to interpret meaningfully. Steps in a meta-analysis
|
| |
